Architects & Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
This is AE911Truth's new 9/11 documentary on the mysterious destruction of World Trade Center Building #7 on 9/11/01. Join actor, Ed Asner, and architect, Richard Gage, AIA, as they narrate an unfolding story that decimates the official account ("collapse due to normal office fires") of this 47 story high-rise which was destroyed on the afternoon of 9/11 in record time: top to bottom in under 7 seconds - and at free-fall acceleration for a third of its fall.
This is AE911Truth's best shot at a professionally produced 15 minute informative and engaging WTC 7 documentary - designed for newcomers. It is free. Please spread far and wide.
The documentary includes several of the dozens of technical and building experts that were interviewed and that appear in our forthcoming full length documentary - 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out. Altogether of course there are more than 1,500 Architects & Engineers that have signed the AE911Truth petition calling for a new investigation of the destruction of all 3 high-rises at the World Trade Center on 9/11.
Special thanks to the AE911Truth volunteer video crew!
We are proud to partner with the 9/11 family members and first responders of RememberBuilding7.org in the 10th Anniversary Campaign to raise awareness about WTC 7 in cities across America.
Please visit http://RememberBuilding7.org and decide what you can do to help the campaign.
Please also support the work of AE911Truth, a non-partisan non-profit 501c3 organization with your financial support by visiting http://AE911Truth.org today and click the Donate button. We are a community organization with no corporate sponsorship. YOU are our lifeline. Join the family of sustaining supporters today!
You can download the hi-res version of this video at http://www2.ae911truth.org/downloads/video/Architects%20and%20Engineers%20-%20Solving%20the%20Mystery%20of%20Building%207.flv
This is being released in conjunction with with the Remember Building 7 10th Anniversary Ad campaign.
- ae911truth's blog
- Login to post comments
Professionally produced
This must have been very hard work. I hope it makes waves. NIST have forsaken their duty and scientific integrity to serve a dark political agenda. It's been painful and outrageous to watch.
Agreed 100%. The dereliction
Agreed 100%.
The dereliction of duty, and the appalling abandonment of the basic principles of science on the part of NIST is breathtaking. I really wonder about how Shyam Sunder had the gall to stand there and justify the following "reasoning":
Q: Did you test for explosives?
A: No.
Q Why not?
A: Because there was no evidence for explosives.
Unf***ingbelievable.
AE911Truth 10th Anniversary Activities - RGage, AIA - 4 mins.; A
Amen Bro.
http://youtu.be/yIOC1J44RYw
Putting a nagging question out there
Are those who are not interested in such evidence still accept the official conspiracy theory that 19 hijackers were solely responsible? Or am I being thick?
Official story
In my view, I could entertain the argument that the government "allowed" hijackers to take the planes and fly them into buildings, for sake of argument at least. But I could not accept the idea that the government "allowed" terrorists to wire up those skyscrapers for demolition. That goes beyond reason.
Love it!
3 things I guess I would have liked to have added:
1. a minute or so showing Shyam Sunder squirm and lie about WTC7 freefall with Chandlers narration
2. same with Gross stating there was no evidence of molten steel (maybe, maybe not)
3. an quick verbal explanation of who and how and why there were 3 light beams at GZ
That garbage at NIST deserve for their children to be so embarrassed about them that they change their surname.
Otherwise, love it!
No Motive
My only compliant is that it doesn't mention the motive for knocking down WTC7.
As usual with 9/11 there are multiple motives:
- Insurance
- SEC: phyiscal evidence of fraud in Enron / Worldcom cases (probably implicating certain texan politicians)
- case against Morgan Stanley
- CIA and FBI files...
The movie should make a nod towards motive...
Motive, schmotive?
Any rookie detective in training for crime-solving knows that *motive* is one of the first parameters that comes under scrutiny. However, motive remains the element which has been roundly ignored by those promoting the official conspiracy yarn (apart from the obvious absurdity that "Muslims hate our freedoms"... there are between 4 to 7 million Muslims in the US and by all accounts, they love our our freedoms as much as anyone, but whatever).
So, what would be a more plausible motive for "fundamentalist Muslims" to carry out 9/11? To get the "sleeping giant" America enraged enough to support then launch multiple wars against multiple Muslim nations (based on lies) killing hundreds of thousands of innocents, trashing those nations' infrastructures with "shock and awe" bombing, rendering large areas polluted for 4,500 million years with radioactive elements and wrecking their economies in the process? Sounds like "inverted motivation", if such exists.
No wonder motive was avoided re 9/11. Who *did* have the motivation to carry out 9/11?
Indeed
Indeed, I agree. Very passionate response, bloggulator. I like it. And that final question is key (and always avoided by the Main Stream Media).
Motive for 9/11
The motive for 9/11 is as simple as the bricklayer's motive to obtain some mortar, so he can do his job laying bricks. For Cheney and those he serves, their motivation is to do their job, to promote military action. For the Neocons, their motivation is to remake the Middle East. Remaking the Middle East is not a stretch in any sense. We remade the Soviet Union into a more or less capitalist state, and we have gone way down that road with Red China as well. Those are huge successes. What the ultimate plan is in the Middle East I can't say. But we are on it, that I know.
Copy of email I'm sending to friends and family
[This is an email I'm sending out to friends and family. Feel free to use it as your own.]
Dear Family and Friends,
Many of you are aware that about six years ago I came to the conclusion that the events of 9/11/2001 could not possibly be explained by the predominant theories promoted through official channels.
The responses I have received have spanned the gamut from agreement to curiosity to dismissal to ridicule to outright hostility.
As the tenth anniversary of these crimes against humanity approaches, I respectfully ask all those of you who remain doubters or fence-sitters to view this 15 minute documentary produced by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw&feature=player_embedded
Soon, we will be exposed to the officially sanctioned ten year memorial production designed to reenforce the state-approved narrative by appealing to our emotions. What we will not hear from official sources and their parrots in the mainstream media is any suggestion of the flood of factual evidence that well-credentialed scientists, architects, engineers, first-responders, journalists, and other knowledgeable professionals have accumulated over these past ten years that refute beyond a reasonable doubt the official decrees about the events of 9/11. We may hear passing snarky references to the "Truthers," we may read articles attempting to explain or even pathologize the movement from a pseudo-psychological perspective. But we will not hear direct, open, honest debate about the actual evidence.
The fact that it is virtually forbidden within mainstream circles to question official decrees regarding one of the most important "trigger events" in all of history should in itself raise questions about the nature of the political landscape we find ourselves in.
There are real psychological barriers to accepting the truth of 9/11. First, nobody likes to be fooled. Second, it's always emotionally easier to accept the existence of an outside enemy, rather that an internal enemy at the highest levels of power. Third, the implications are nearly unthinkable for most people. Yet the truth remains the truth whether we accept it or not. Please remember that the German people tried to fall back on their ignorance of Nazi atrocities, arguing that such psychopathic behavior by their rulers would have been unthinkable for the average person. The rest of the world did not not take kindly to that defense.
The truth continues to emerge. An opinion poll recently conducted in NYC found that nearly half, 48%, want a new investigation. I have no doubt that future generations will know the Big Lie for what it is. The question is, will the people of the U.S. finally get out in front and find the courage to force accountability upon the perpetrators.
In the name of Peace and Justice,
9/11 open letter
I would add to the letter that appeals to the public to look closer at 9/11 and look past the disinformation, to say up front why it is so important to do this.